Ocnus.Net
News Before It's News
About us | Ocnus? |

Front Page 
 
 Africa
 
 Analyses
 
 Business
 
 Dark Side
 
 Defence & Arms
 
 Dysfunctions
 
 Editorial
 
 International
 
 Labour
 
 Light Side
 
 Research
Search

Analyses Last Updated: Apr 17, 2018 - 1:23:23 PM


In Third World War Now Going On, ‘Russia has No Allies,’ Venediktov Says
By Paul Goble, Window on Eurasia, April 15, 2018
Apr 16, 2018 - 2:18:47 PM

Email this article
 Printer friendly page

A third world war has been going on since at least NATO’s bombing of Belgrade in 1999 and Russia’s intervention in Georgia in 2008, Aleksey Venediktov says. But it is a very different war than those in the past, one where the participants are not trying to seize territory but rather secure influence over other states.

In this conflict, which may go from cold to hot, the editor of  Ekho Moskvy tells Kazan’s Business Gazeta in an interview portions of which were posted online today, “Russia has no allies” and thus can depend on no one but itself as events both planned and unplanned unfold (business-gazeta.ru/article/378902).

This war or more hopefully conflict “really is a world wide one; it is simply that certain players like China are not very visible, but they are taking an active part in it.” The goal in this conflict is different than that in the past: earlier states sought to gain territory; now, however, they are seeking not the territorial re-division of the world but rather one of influence.

Putin, Venediktov continues, constantly refers to the need to return to the Yalta-Potsdam system in which “every great power has its own sphere of influence.”  But Ronald Reagan in 1987 made clear that there would never be a Yalta-type system again. That has remained US policy.

But the important thing for Moscow to remember is that “in this war, Russia does not have any allies,” the Ekho Moskvy editor says.  “Putin,” he continues, “is an extraordinarily careful individual … Therefore, I think, if he were to sense the chance of a shift of the war into a hot phase, he would take measures,” knowing the capacities of the Western allies and China.

The danger of escalation even to a nuclear exchange nonetheless exists because of the possibilities of accidents. When the militaries of various countries are in one place, their commanders may respond “without waiting for a call from Moscow or Washington or Jerusalem or Damascus” and then things can go wrong.

According to Venediktov, the forces of both Russia and the Western allies “have received orders to avoid any clash. But I am concerned because an accident is possible,” one that was like the downing of a Russian plane by Turkey. If something like that happened again, then there is “a high degree of probability” that it could “lead to an escalation, political at a minimum.”


Source:Ocnus.net 2018

Top of Page

Analyses
Latest Headlines
Uneven Burden-Sharing Isn’t NATO’s Biggest Problem
The Political and Military Significance of NATO’s Trident Juncture 2018 Exercises
Did Democrats do enough to stop Kavanaugh? Not even close, and don’t expect more from a “blue wave”
The “gravedigger of American democracy”: Holocaust historian says Mitch McConnell broke politics
The US-Mexico-Canada Trade Deal Is a Weapon Against Chinese Imperialism
A Greek tragedy: how the EU is destroying a country
Cold War, Hot Peace
Can the Supreme Court be saved? Kavanaugh hearings could be a turning point
Israel: Russia Gets Embarrassed And Threatening
Boris Johnson: My plan for a better Brexit