One year to the day
after his election as president of France, Nicolas Sarkozy strikes an increasingly
lonely figure on the French political scene. Having referred to himself
as the "buying power president" to emphasize his goal of increasing
disposable income, he has instead become the object of a nationwide case of
buyer's remorse. His popularity has plummeted in opinion polls, and in
the absence of any true political opposition (outside of an increasingly
hostile press), he faces growing disenchantment within his own UMP
majority. In a country where politics is a blood sport, and where the only
thing worse than success is failure, his precarious position has already led
some to wonder whether his presidency is past saving.
A good deal of the blame lies with the high expectations that Sarkozy
generated as a candidate. A year ago, he campaigned under a reform
platform that he described as a "rupture" with the paralysis of
previous administrations. In the face of France's historic distrust and
hostility to market liberalism, Sarkozy made the value of work his campaign's
central focus. "Work more to earn more" became both his
campaign's slogan, and his promise to liberate the country's economy from its
suffocatingly arcane regulations.
But so far, even where Sarkozy has successfully
implemented his program, the results have been far less dramatic than
expected. His tax-break for workers who put in overtime, for instance,
has had relatively minor impact on earnings, while adding yet more red tape
for employers. The final terms for rolling back retirement benefits for
the so-called "special regimes" (heavy laborers who currently
qualify for a full pension after fewer years of active contribution) have yet
to be announced; but they are expected to result in largely symbolic cost
reductions.
In fact, despite Sarkozy's energetic first year in office, very little seems
to have actually changed for the average worker and consumer, other than the
skyrocketing cost of gas and basic commodities. While Sarkozy is not
responsible for either, the resulting disappointment has proven politically costly,
and has been exacerbated by the fact that, so far, some of the biggest
ruptures delivered by President Sarkozy have been with the promises made by
Candidate Sarkozy. A promise to replace the country's numerous
employment contracts with a simplified and unique one was abandoned.
Others, including a professional reinsertion stipend that would have
ensured that salary for an unemployed worker returning to work would be
higher than the unemployment benefits it replaced, have been delayed or
watered down.
Sarkozy's memory has also proven to be selective when it comes to his foreign
policy. Vocally opposed throughout the campaign to Turkey's adhesion to
the EU, his first European initiative upon taking office was to greenlight
ongoing negotiations with Ankara in return for quick passage of his prized
"EU mini-treaty," the yet-to-be-ratified Treaty of Lisbon.
Having promised to withdraw French forces from Afghanistan, Sarkozy instead
agreed last month to deploy 700 additional troops, in the face of
overwhelmingly opposed public opinion. And while Candidate Sarkozy
declared that the promotion of human rights would assume a central role in
French foreign policy, that hasn't kept President Sarkozy from pursuing
France's commercial and strategic interests with Libya, Russia, and China, to
name just a few.
At times, too, the promises Sarkozy has kept have proven more damaging than
the ones he has broken. His first legislative success was a tax reform bill
that capped rates at 50 percent, raised the per person tax-deductible
inheritance from €50,000 to €150,000, and allowed those subject to France's
"wealth tax" to deduct up to €50,000 by investing in a small or
medium-sized business. The measures, while far from shocking to an
American sensibility, were widely criticized in France as a post-election
handout to Sarkozy's wealthy entourage.
Likewise his immigration policy, which at the time of the
presidential campaign was largely seen as a ploy to woo the National Front
electorate of far-right candidate Jean-Marie Le Pen. But Sarkozy has
pursued it with determination, implementing a voluntary recourse to DNA
testing for immigrants who claim family unification status, as well as a
yearly quota for deporting illegal immigrants. The measures offended
deep-seated sensitivities anchored in the historic legacy of WWII, sparking
popular outrage and galvanizing flagging political opposition.
As much as the content of his legislative record, though, it is increasingly
Sarkozy's style that has put him in the crosshairs of public opinion and the
media. Quickly dubbed the "hyper-president" by the French
press, for the first 10 months of his term Sarkozy was rarely, if ever, out
of the spotlight. The "presidentialization" of the government
was significant, since historically the French president has primarily
functioned as a head of state, rather than a head of government. Apart
from foreign policy, which he has traditionally overseen very closely, the
president has generally identified the broad lines of domestic policy and left
it to his prime minister to implement them.
The arrangement served to
preserve the president's dignity from the political rough and tumble of
governing, as well as to provide a convenient head to roll in the event of a
setback. By contrast, Sarkozy is known for being intimately involved in
preparing legislation, at times bringing in the ministers concerned at a late
stage of negotiations.
In addition to his governing style, Sarkozy's personal style has also caused
him problems. From the night of his election -- when he stopped on his
way to deliver his victory speech to dine at a ritzy restaurant with a
collection of bankers, industrial magnates and popular celebrities -- Sarkozy
has worn the presidency as if it were a gaudy piece of jewellery to
flaunt. Indeed, his taste for Rolex watches and mirrored Rayban
sunglasses recently won him the nickname of the "bling bling
president." His unpopular tax package was introduced in the
aftermath of a widely criticized post-election vacation on the yacht of a
wealthy tycoon friend. His summer vacation in Maine was spent at the
home of yet another.
Perhaps most unusual for France, though, where politicians' private lives
were historically considered off-limits, Sarkozy's romantic life has been the
subject of a media feeding frenzy, beginning on election day, when his
then-wife, Cécilia, was notably absent when it came time to actually vote,
and visibly pale and tense at his side when he greeted his followers later
that night. Their subsequent divorce, and Sarkozy's remarriage to
ex-model Carla Bruni, has fuelled not only the gossip columns, but the
mainstream political press for months.
Of course, there's no small amount of hypocrisy in the media subsequently
taking him to task for his exhibitionism. But under Sarkozy, the
presidency has at times seemed more like a reality TV show -- unscripted,
unrehearsed, and unedited -- than the incarnation of the French nation, as
the oath of office puts it. The result has been a bulimic backlash
against what many have come to regard as too much presidential presence and
not enough presidential stature. From his agitated mannerisms, to his
inelegant use of the French language, Sarkozy has been accused of vulgarizing
the office of the president.
The charge, while not untrue, says as much about France as it does about
Sarkozy.
"L'exception
française" is an essential part of French cultural
identity. From its non-aligned posture within the Cold War alliance, to
its rearguard resistance to globalization and market liberalization, France
has consistently defined itself as apart of -- rather than a part of -- the
West. Sarkozy's program, from re-integrating into the NATO command
structure to liberalizing the economy, represents the implicit suggestion
that France become a country like the others. And while Sarkozy might
not incarnate the France of De Gaulle, Mitterand, or even Chirac, the
argument can be made that he does reflect the France of Sarkozy, for which
reality TV is no longer the cause for philosophical treatises but an accepted
part of popular culture. So the revulsion that he now provokes might
very well be the shock of recognition. Either way, the rupture that
Candidate Sarkozy announced to such advantage has proven both more difficult
and more costly to achieve in the hands of Sarkozy, President.