Ocnus.Net
News Before It's News
About us | Ocnus? |

Front Page 
 
 Africa
 
 Analyses
 
 Business
 
 Dark Side
 
 Defence & Arms
 
 Dysfunctions
 
 Editorial
 
 International
 
 Labour
 
 Light Side
 
 Research
Search

Analyses Last Updated: Mar 13, 2010 - 10:18:23 AM


Ugliest Filibuster Yet?
By Kevin Drum, Mother Jones 12/3/10
Mar 13, 2010 - 10:17:08 AM

Email this article
 Printer friendly page

Last month, the Senate voted 52-33 in favor of confirming Craig Becker for a seat on the National Labor Relations Board. Or, to put it another way, Becker's nomination failed. Republicans filibustered his appointment, which meant that he needed 60 votes, not 51.

Just another day at the office? Not quite, because there's a backstory here that makes this case of routine Republican obstructionism even worse than usual. The NLRB, it turns out, was the battleground for the first filibuster ever of a presidential nominee to the executive branch, one of Jimmy Carter's appointments back in 1980, and it was the opening shot in the GOP's war against unions that's lasted to this day.

But in the case of the NLRB, Republicans and Democrats soon worked out a truce: The president would be allowed to name three appointees to the five-person board, and the other party would be allowed to name two. Obama followed this pattern, nominating two Democrats and one Republican shortly after he was sworn in. Republicans initially went along with this, and all three of Obama's nominees were reported out of committee.

But, as John Judis put it in The New Republic, "What happened next says a lot about the sorry state of politics in Washington." John McCain, still bitter over his loss to Obama and preparing for a primary battle against a right-wing opponent, put a hold on Becker. His nomination went back to committee, but this time Republicans, under pressure from business interests, decided to break the 30-year-old truce. Using a paper-thin excuse, they voted unanimously against him, and when the package of nominations went to the Senate floor, Republicans voted unanimously again. With 60 votes required to break the Republican filibuster, all three of Obama's nominations—nominations that had been agreed to by the GOP leadership months before—failed.

In other words, even for the modern Republican Party, this was pretty squalid behavior. Not only did they break their own leadership's agreement to seat Becker, but their intransigence has left the NLRB barely even functional. With three seats open, they don't have a quorum for any but the most routine business.

So what's next? There are two choices: Either Obama caves, or else he makes a recess appointment. His next opportunity is the Easter recess from March 29 to April 11. It's one he shouldn't pass up.

 


Source:Ocnus.net 2010

Top of Page

Analyses
Latest Headlines
China Pivot -- or Pirouette?
Why Germany Isn't Benefiting from Euro's Woe
The Odd Couple: Romney Vs. Gingrich
Germans and Greeks at Bay
Forgetting a Key Lesson from Watergate?
How to Save the Euro
Ibn Warraq’s Eloquent Defense of Western Civilization
Russia's Shifting Political Landscape, Part 2
Democrats See New Weapon in Congressional Insider-Trading Bill
So Much for Davos