Ocnus.Net
News Before It's News
About us | Ocnus? |

Front Page 
 
 Africa
 
 Analyses
 
 Business
 
 Dark Side
 
 Defence & Arms
 
 Dysfunctions
 
 Editorial
 
 International
 
 Labour
 
 Light Side
 
 Research
Search

Dark Side Last Updated: Jun 28, 2022 - 12:18:50 PM


How To Discipline a Rogue Supreme Court
By Jamelle Bouie, NY Times, 25/6/22
Jun 27, 2022 - 12:28:27 PM

Email this article
 Printer friendly page

The power to check the Supreme Court is there, in the Constitution. The task now is to seize it.

The Supreme Court does not exist above the constitutional system.

It can shape the constitutional order, it can say what the Constitution means, but it cannot shield itself from the power of the other branches. The Supreme Court can be checked and the Supreme Court can be balanced.

It is tempting, in the immediate wake of the court’s ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health, to say that there’s nothing to be done about the reactionary majority on the court. But that’s just not true. The Constitution provides a number of paths by which Congress can restrain and discipline a rogue court.

It can impeach and remove justices. It can increase or decrease the size of the court itself (at its inception, the Supreme Court had only six members). It can strip the court of its jurisdiction over certain issues or it can weaken its power of judicial review by requiring a supermajority of justices to sign off on any decision that overturns a law. Congress can also rebuke the court with legislation that simply cancels the decision in question.

In the face of a reckless, reactionary and power-hungry court, Congress has options. The problem is politics. Despite the arrogance of the current Supreme Court — despite its almost total lack of democratic legitimacy — there is little to no appetite within the Democratic Party for a fight over the nature of the court and its place in our constitutional system. For many Democrats, President Roosevelt’s attempt to expand the size of the court is less a triumph than a cautionary tale — a testament to the limits of presidential leadership and presidential power.

But Roosevelt did eventually get a Supreme Court that allowed most of the New Deal to stand. The threat worked. The court was humbled.

It will take time to build the kind of power and consensus needed to make significant changes to the court. But even the work of amassing that power and putting that consensus together can stand as a credible threat to a Supreme Court that has acted, under conservative control, as if it stands above the constitutional system, unaccountable to anyone other than itself.

The power to check the Supreme Court is there, in the Constitution. The task now is to seize it.


Source:Ocnus.net 2022

Top of Page

Dark Side
Latest Headlines
Inside the War Between Trump and His Generals
Syria: Life In A Low Priority Disaster
Who were the most dangerous women in history?
Iran Warning Update: Iranian Proxies May Attack US in Response to Iraqi Political Crisis
Bypassing Russian Censorship
The high price of becoming a student in Russia
Warplanes: VTOL UAVs
The White Power Mercenaries Fighting For the Lost Cause Around the World
‘He was shot by his own’ A Russian soldier was killed by friendly fire.
Iran’s Position on Caspian Seriously Impedes Moscow’s Plans to End Sanctions