Ocnus.Net
News Before It's News
About us | Ocnus? |

Front Page 
 
 Africa
 
 Analyses
 
 Business
 
 Dark Side
 
 Defence & Arms
 
 Dysfunctions
 
 Editorial
 
 International
 
 Labour
 
 Light Side
 
 Research
Search

Dark Side Last Updated: Oct 9, 2008 - 10:37:59 AM


O Tempora, O Mores
By Bob Kendal, Political Cortex 8/10/08
Oct 9, 2008 - 10:36:13 AM

Email this article
 Printer friendly page
Richard S. Fuld Jr. was chief executive officer at Lehman Brothers Holding when it collapsed.

In the New York Times account of this dramatic economic crash of a 158 year old business investment giant, Fuld, battered by the reality of his position at the helm of this U.S. business, and formerly highly respected landmark, had a lot to say at a congressional hearing according to the New York Times October 7:

"Richard S. Fuld Jr. blamed the news media.  He blamed the short-sellers.  He blamed the government as well as what he characterized an `extraordinary run on the bank.'

"Instead in his first public appearance since Lehman's collapse, Mr. Fuld said in sworn testimony before a congressional panel on Monday, that while he took full responsibility for the debacle, he believed that all his decisions `were both prudent and appropriate' given the information he had at the time."

But Fuld's explanation of who was to blame for Lehman Brother Holding's collapse didn't sit well with angry members on the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.  As they listened in shock and disgust, with outrage they quizzed Fuld with hostile questions regarding the hundreds of millions he made over the last eight years.

John L. Mica, Florida Republican, bluntly demanded, "Mr. Fuld, people want to know if you defrauded investors."

Obviously, Fuld recognized how he managed to make his millions was the burning question of the day.  Fuld explained quietly that he had joined Lehman Brothers 42 years ago.  He also added that he had never worked anywhere else, and was haunted by the economic icon's horrendous collapse.

Obviously, Fuld recognized how he managed to make his millions was the burning question of the day.  Fuld explained quietly that he had joined Lehman Brothers 42 years ago.  He also added that he had never worked anywhere else, and was haunted by the economic icon's horrendous collapse.

As he continued explaining, he said he had not misled investors, claiming he believed until 5 days before the September 15 bankruptcy filing, that Lehman Brothers Holdings remained in decent health.

According to the New York Times:

"Mr. Fuld and other Lehman executives are facing preliminary inquires by federal prosecutors into whether public statements about the bank's position amounted to fraud."

The claim that he was confronted with was a significant piece of evidence that sharply conflicted with his claim he believed until 5 days before filing bankruptcy on September 15 he thought Shearson-Lehman was in good health.

A conflicting memo was presented:

"At one point on Monday, Mr. Fuld was confronted with an internal memo dated June 8 that included warnings about Lehman's condition, and asked the question 'Why did we allow ourselves to be so exposed?'"

After examining the memo at length, Fuld raised his head and said, "This document does not look familiar to me."

According to the New York Times:

"Later in the hearing, Mr. Fuld was asked why Lehman approved nearly $20 million in payments for two departing executives about a week before the bankruptcy filing.  Mr. Fuld said one payment, $2 million for Andrew J. Morton, the head of fixed-income was 'deemed appropriate for his years of service.'

"Another $16 million, paid to Benoit Savoret who was leaving as chief officer for Europe, and the Middle East, was a result of a contractual obligation."

On the question of what his mistakes were, Mr. Fuld answered after some thought:

"Mr. Fuld said he wished he had moved more quickly to reduce Lehman's commercial real estate holdings."

After the five hour televised hearing the congressional members who had listened to revelations of the huge salaries and bonuses of Lehman Brothers were outraged.  Apparently the deregulation of the banks and investment corporations had generated situations like Lehman Brothers' tragic collapse.

The investors who trusted these executives have been betrayed.

The bonuses given to the Shearson executives make a mockery of fair play and justice.

No matter how far the Dow sinks, TV shows the stock market crew applauding themselves.  

When Shearson Lehman Brothers collapsed, perhaps they should have applauded themselves for exiting with all those millions and certainly be grateful for those who voted for bank deregulation, which made their multi-million dollar getaway possible.   

Source:Ocnus.net 2008

Top of Page

Dark Side
Latest Headlines
Palestinian Factions Torture Opponents
Affaire Clearstream: Villepin renvoyé en correctionnelle
Latin America’s Response to Narco-Fueled Transnational Crime
Ahmed Dogan to be Questioned over Corruption Allegations
A Better Reply
Nagaland: Epitome of Police Ineptitude
War of the Ex-Comrades
Federal Air Marshals Busy Smuggling Coke and Molesting Kids
Missiles in Belarus
Aso: What POW servitude?