News Before It's News
About us | Ocnus? |

Front Page 
 Dark Side
 Defence & Arms
 Light Side

Dark Side Last Updated: May 9, 2019 - 11:57:26 AM

White House Failure to Document Heads of State Meetings Violates Records Law
By Tom Blanton and Lauren Harper. Natioal Security Archives, 7/5/19
May 8, 2019 - 11:53:08 AM

Email this article
 Printer friendly page

The National Security Archive today joined Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) and the Society for Historians of American Foreign Relations (SHAFR) in filing suit to compel the White House to create and preserve records of the President's meetings with foreign leaders.

News organizations have reported that in multiple meetings with foreign heads of state, the Trump administration has excluded note takers from the conversations.  For example, The New York Times on January 15, 2019 headlined "Trump and Putin Have Met Five Times, What Was Said Is a Mystery."  The Associated Press reported on February 27, 2019, "Trump-Kim go one-on-one: Who will know what was really said?"

The lawsuit filed today asks the federal district court for mandamus and declaratory relief to compel the White House to create and preserve records of presidential meetings with foreign leaders, as required by the Presidential Records Act.

The National Security Archive has obtained through the Freedom of Information Act and published thousands of "memoranda of conversation" of heads of state meetings dating back to President Eisenhower and forward to President Clinton's 1999 telephone call with Russian President Boris Yeltsin in which Yeltsin announced his successor would be Vladimir Putin.

Archive director Tom Blanton commented, "The Archive went to court to preserve presidential records when President Reagan tried to junk his email backup tapes in 1989. We have sued every president since, Democratic and Republican, to make sure the White House obeyed the records laws.  Today, the problem goes beyond improperly shredding records, to the deliberate failure to create the records in the first place."

SHAFR president Professor Barbara Keys remarked, "Keeping records of top-level meetings has been part of common-sense diplomatic practice for centuries. Failing to make or keep records damages not only the capacity of history to render judgment in the future, but also of government to pursue the country’s interests in the present.  It also undermines the principle of government accountability that is the very bedrock of democracy."

CREW executive director Noah Bookbinder said, "It is clear that President Trump and White House officials have gone to great lengths to hold high-level meetings with foreign governments and carry out foreign policy objectives while blatantly ignoring recordkeeping laws and preventing national security officials and the American people from understanding what they are doing.”

The legal team representing the plaintiffs in the case is led by Anne Weismann of CREW, together with Conor Shaw of CREW, and pro bono counsel George Clarke, Mireille Oldak, and Steven Chasin of Baker McKenzie.


Read the complaint: https://nsarchive2.gwu.edu//dc.html?doc=5992983-National-Security-Archive-PRA-Complaint-as-Filed

Source:Ocnus.net 2019

Top of Page

Dark Side
Latest Headlines
Not So Green On The Other Side: How A Russian Tycoon's $165 Million U.S. Cannabis Bet Went Up In Smoke
The Fable of the Chinese Whistleblower
The road beyond Wigan Pier
Did Iran Convert a Dumb Rocket Into a Guided Aeroballistic Missile?
Florida scientist said she was fired for 'refusing to manipulate' COVID-19 data
Amnesty Demands Justice After Iranian 'Killing Spree' Against November Protesters
The Invisible Threat to China’s Navy: Corruption
China's Cyber War Against America
Maduro’s Frontman Coordinates Gold Payments from Venezuela to Iran
Germany Takes Back its Sovereignty from the European Union