In November 2022 a Ukrainian sniper used a Ukrainian made sniper rifle to make the second longest sniper distance kill record, against a Russian soldier, at a distance of 2,710 meters. The record is held by a Canadian special operation forces sniper in Iraq during 2017. An ISIL (Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant) gunman was killed at a distance of 3,540 meters. Canada was not officially fighting on the ground in Iraq at the time but Canadian special operations troops were there to train and advise their Iraqi counterparts. This involved things like calling in air strikes or, for snipers, providing overwatch; i.,e., looking for enemy ambushes, hidden bombs or snipers. Sniper teams often do this at great distances because they are accustomed to watching for targets about to come within range of their rifles. In this case the sniper saw ISIL getting into position to attack some troops the Canadians were supporting. He used a 12.7mm rifle to make the long shot that disrupted an ISIL ambush which would have killed Iraqi soldiers and civilians. Such long-distance sniper kills are a relatively recent phenomenon. For several decades the longest such shot was from 1967 when a veteran U.S. Marine Corps shooter rigged a .50 caliber (12.7mm) machine-gun with a sniper scope and used it in single shot mode to hit distant targets. His longest verified kill with this rig was 2,250 meters. It wasn’t until the 1980s that the (12.7mm) sniper rifle was introduced and quickly demonstrated that it would be possible to regularly make accurate shots at individuals more than 2,000 meters away. It was another Canadian sniper using one of the new 12.7mm rifles in Afghanistan who broke the 1967 record with a 2,400-meter shot.
The Ukrainian sniper used a Snipex Alligator 14.5mm rifle which is most commonly used to damage vehicles and equipment at long distances. This rifle was introduced in 2020 and officially adopted by Ukrainian forces in 2021. This is a heavy 25 kg (55 pound) weapon with a maximum range of 7,000 meters against large targets. The 14.5mm round can penetrate 1omm of armor at 1,500 meters (a mile). The Snipex has a standard Picatinny rail so that a wide variety of scopes can be used. It is a bolt-action rifle with a five round box magazine, a bipod, a muzzle brake, recoil isolator and elastic multilayer shoulder pad. It is two meters (79 inches) long. The Snipex is regularly used against moving or stationary high-value targets like air-defense systems, parked aircraft and enemy defensive positions. Hits against vehicles or bunkers are regularly made at distances up to 3,000 meters. The Snipex rifle was heavily used against the initial invasion in February and later against Russian defensive positions. The Snipex rifle is demoralizing for Russian troops in defensive positions and will occasionally be used against individuals at ranges of over 2,000 meters. Most of the front lines in Ukraine are generally inactive, The Snipex rifle is an inexpensive way to demoralize Russian defenders even more than they already are.
The unique Snipex Alligator rifle is one of several modern 14.5mm rifles introduced recently. These rifles first appeared during World War II and were used by Russian and East European forces ever since. The modern sniper was made possible by technology and necessity and it happened in stages. In the 1880s hunters and soldiers began abandoning single shot, black powder rifles for newly developed smokeless powder. By the end of the 19th century smokeless powder rifles (and pistols) were the military standard and that marked the beginning of a trend of technical and tactical changes which made sniping deadlier (more accurate and at longer ranges) and more common. Even before World War I (1914-1918) soldiers and civilian hunters were demonstrating how to regularly hit man size targets several hundred meters distant by taking advantage of the new smokeless powder.
Sniping did not start with smokeless powder. Hundreds of years earlier hunters worldwide quickly noted the superiority of gunpowder weapons and eagerly sought them. One of the misconceptions of American Indians eager to obtain black powder muskets and rifles was that they were not interested in accurate long-range shots. Actually, they were and for more practical uses. The media (and historian) misconceptions were caused by the fact that the Indian style of warfare emphasized getting close and killing your human foe with a handheld weapon. Gunpowder was for hunting and Indians preferred using their muskets and rifles for that because these weapons were much more effective than bows or spears. It was a simple matter of physics. Indians knew the importance of sneaking up on big game (deer, elk, buffalo) to be close enough (under 50 meters) to get that one shot that would hit the prey before it could run away. But a musket or rifled musket ball (typically over 14mm in diameter) hit with far more damaging impact than an arrow or spear. Indians soon enjoyed a much-improved diet by using firearms rather than traditional weapons to hunt big game. Even into the 20th century tribal hunters all over the world still treasure World War I era military surplus bolt action rifles using smokeless powder bullets that can bring down big game several hundred meters distant. This tradition of accurate long-range shooting was popular throughout the Americas and a major reason why, when nations like the U.S. and Canada went to war with largely conscript armies, their infantry commanders knew to learn who the best shots were and assign them to sniper (or “sharpshooter”) duty.
Americans early on adopted the practice of using expert shooters (with black power muskets or longer-range rifled muskets) to aim for the enemy officers and sergeants in order to disrupt the professional troops they faced during their colonial wars, the American Revolution and ever since. European armies saw this as dishonorable until they gradually adopted it themselves. Snipers were, early on, seen as a disruptive use of precision firepower. Shooting the enemy leaders or constantly threatening enemy troops with sniper fire became more common as the sniper rifles, associated technology and training techniques became more effective.
The current use of a “sniper team” was standard practice in the U.S. Army during World War II. Back then the infantry training manuals advised using expert shooters (equipped with older, bolt-action rifles equipped with a scope) in pairs with the two shooters finding a good location to shoot from and then taking turns manning their rifle while the other used a pair of binoculars to seek out targets and direct the shooter. This was the origin of the spotter and shooter system. Like most infantry tactics it was developed by civilian hunters seeking a large animal that was hard to sneak up on. One hunter would use binoculars to scan an area where the animals were known to congregate or travel through while the shooter used a rifle with or without a scope to make the shot when the opportunity arose.
During the Korean War (1950-53), American division commanders created "Ranger Companies," composed of their most skilled stalkers and scouts, who also tended to be expert marksmen. These rangers were disbanded after Korea, but were revived in Vietnam, in the form of LRRPs (Long Range Reconnaissance Patrols) and other specialized units. After Vietnam, the Ranger Regiment was created, but as a force of elite light infantry, not scouts. More of these ranger type skills were taught to all troops, but not in a concentrated enough way to make a difference, though special operations troops were expected to have sniper skills and typically use single shots in combat, even when equipped with assault rifles that can fire on full automatic (like a machine-gun). The U.S. Army Special Forces emphasized sniper skills and the U.S. Navy SEALs and British commandos considered sniper skills essential. The U.S. Marine Corps established small "Scout-Sniper" units, and utilized both these skills to both find the enemy, and kill them if necessary.
Sniper rifle accessories were available from the beginning. Even before smokeless powder arrived there were primitive sniper scopes and by the late 19th century, when most rifles used metallic cartridges, expert shooters found it worthwhile to pay more for cartridges loaded with uniform loads of higher quality black powder. This uniformity of propellant became standard with the introduction of smokeless powder and expert snipers again found it useful to pay more for better quality rifle rounds (“hand loaded” by an expert using higher quality, and more expensive, materials).
By the end of the 20th century more powerful and better-quality rifle scopes were widely available and after 2001 there were more and more electronically enhanced scopes which used sensors and were computerized to the extent that over 70 percent of first-time users could hit targets over 900 meters distant with their first shot. For professional snipers without computerized scopes, first shot success averaged about 25 percent and 70 percent on the second shot. Second shots are not always possible as the target tends to duck after the first one. The U.S. Army tested computerized scopes, found that those worked, and went about transferring the system to a military sniper rifle. The major obstacle was the wear and tear of battlefield use. But snipers are trained to take good care of their rifles, scopes and the growing number of electronic gadgets they now use. The XS1 and similar systems continue to be evaluated and gradually the technology they use is being transferred to military weapons.
In 2014 the XS1 with the bipod, loaded and with the scope, weighed 9.25 kg (20.4 pounds). It is a bolt action rifle with a five round magazine and fires the .338 Lapua Magnum (a longer-range round already widely used by snipers). It has a folding stock and is 1.26 meters unfolded and 1.12 meters folded. The rifle’s computerized fire control system collects much information (target imagery, atmospheric conditions, cant, inclination, Coriolis Effect) but the shooter still has to estimate wind velocity and direction. The scope incorporates a display that tells the shooter how to move the rifle to hit the distant target that has been selected and when to pull the trigger. The rifle actually fires only when it is properly lined up. The manufacturer soon sold nearly a thousand of these rifles, mainly to wealthy hunters who don’t like to miss.
Initial results of the U.S. Army testing found that, when used by trained snipers, first round hits were achieved nearly 100 percent of the time. Trained snipers are very effective, but the XS1 and its technology provided snipers and regular troops with the ability to get that all-important first shot on target over 90 percent of the time. Sometimes there are targets that require that because, as any sniper knows, if the target notices the first shot he will often duck fast enough to avoid the more accurate second shot following several seconds after the first.
Other sniper innovations involve better training techniques to provide new snipers with the needed skills at handling stalking, firing in limited visibility situations and, in emergencies, rapid fire engagements. Computer based shooting ranges have proved very useful in this regard.
Since 2001 American soldiers and marines have greatly increased their use of snipers and the success of this move spread to other countries. The more aggressive use of snipers in that period is one of many changes in ground combat. In that time, because of Iraq and Afghanistan, infantry tactics have changed considerably. This has largely gone unnoticed back home, unless you happen to know an old soldier or marine that remembers the old style of shooting. Put simply, the emphasis is on a lot fewer bullets fired and much more accurate shooting. Elite forces, like the Special Forces and SEALs, have always operated this way. But that's because they had the skill, and opportunity to train frequently, to make it work. The army and marines have found that their troops can fight the same way with the help of some new weapons, equipment, and tactics, plus lots of combat experience and specialized training. This includes the use of new shooting simulators, which allows troops to fire a lot of virtual bullets in a realistic setting, without all the hassle and expense of going to a firing range.
One thing that helped, and that was developing for two decades, was the greater use of snipers. Currently, about ten percent of American infantry are trained and equipped as snipers. Commanders have found that filling the battlefield with two-man (spotter and shooter) sniper teams not only provides more intelligence, but also a lot of precision firepower. Snipers are better at finding the enemy, and killing them with a minimum of noise and fuss. New rifle sights (both day and night types) have made all infantry capable of accurate, single shot, fire. With the emphasis on keeping civilian casualties down, and the tendency of the enemy to use civilians as human shields, lots of snipers, or infantrymen who can take an accurate shot at typical battle ranges (under 100 meters), are the best way to win without killing a lot of civilians.
New sniper equipment has made a big difference. Since 2001 the U.S. Army has issued several new sniper rifles. These include both bolt-action and semi-automatic rifles as well as a wider variety of calibers and special long-range rounds. Bolt-action rifles are inherently more accurate because their bolt does not move when a fired bullet is still travelling down the barrel, but semi-automatic rifles are gradually reducing this advantage. Many snipers have adopted more powerful rounds like the .338 Lapua Magnum and the .300 Magnum and ever more useful accessories. Several sniper rifle models were modified to handle the longer-range rounds.
Previously, many snipers have had success using tuned up M-14s (from the 1960s) as sniper rifles. While semi-automatic and rugged, the M14 wasn't designed to be a sniper rifle. The AR-10 was a better model for a semi-automatic sniper rifle, since it is inherently more reliable and accurate. As far back as World War II it was known that there were many situations where a semi-automatic sniper rifle would come in handy. But it's taken over half a century to solve the reliability and accuracy problems.