Ocnus.Net
News Before It's News
About us | Ocnus? |

Front Page 
 
 Africa
 
 Analyses
 
 Business
 
 Dark Side
 
 Defence & Arms
 
 Dysfunctions
 
 Editorial
 
 International
 
 Labour
 
 Light Side
 
 Research
Search

Defence & Arms Last Updated: Jul 7, 2020 - 11:43:37 AM


The EU’s New Defensive Approach to a Rising China
By Philippe Le Corre, ISPI, 29 June 2020
Jul 6, 2020 - 11:28:08 AM

Email this article
 Printer friendly page

Chinese officials have been repeatedly calling for closer cooperation with Europe, but the era of Covid-19 has made China-EU relations sour to an unprecedented low level since the two formally established diplomatic relations, 45 years ago.

Instead of a celebration, the EU-China annual summit which took place through videoconferences on June 22, showed irreconcilable differences over issues such as Hong Kong’s newly-announced national security law, cybersecurity and human rights. In addition, nothing appeared noticeably conclusive on the economic front, where China has not responded to the EU’s call to finalize a much-needed “Common Agreement on Investment,” tackling the issues of state subsidies and procurement. Cooperation on other critical subjects such as climate change, global governance (including the reform of the World Trade Organization), and sustainable development seems limited to pure rhetorical language rather than concrete actions on the part of the Chinese side. Even Sino-European collaboration on Covid-related vaccines remains modest.

Rather than a final EU-China joint communique, two differing statements were released in June, following the summit. President Ursula von der Leyen of the European Commission said “the relationship between the EU and China is simultaneously one of the most strategically important and one of the most challenging that we have” adding that the relationship with China was “not an easy one.” As for Chinese president Xi Jinping, he insisted that China “wants peace instead of hegemony”. “No matter how the international situation changes, China will take the side of multilateralism and adhere to the global governance concept of extensive consultation, joint contribution and shared benefits,” he added.

Such comments are revealing in the sense that Europeans are trying their luck with a different approach to China, more defensive if not confrontational. In fact, politicians may not have a choice following Covid-19. The Chinese government is consistently seen by European public opinions as the most responsible for the severity of the pandemic. According to a recent poll, 60 percent of people in the UK and France, and 47 percent of Germans see the Chinese government as a force for bad in the world and their opinion has worsened through the pandemic. Unlike the previous financial crisis (2008-10) which had led to multiple take-overs by Chinese state-owned enterprises in southern Europe, this time Europeans do not seem attracted by prospective Chinese FDIs. Nor are Chinese investors currently willing to invest: China’s share of FDI stock stands at less than 3 percent on average across the EU. Meanwhile, the controversy around Chinese medical assistance during the peak of the pandemic has led to more confusion and back-pedalling on the part of European politicians.

Early this year, Brussels officials were still hoping that Germany would be hosting a 27+1 leaders’ summit in Leipzig with Xi Jinping, crowning Angela Merkel as the one senior European politician that could handle China. Merkel’s approach has been very much about light criticism and face-saving exercises vis-à-vis Chinese leaders. This has had a lot to do with the two countries’ fairly balanced trade relationship. For years, German machine tools and cars have been in high demand in a fast-growing China, increasing many German industrial companies’ profitability. Some experts see a reluctance from Chancellor Merkel to antagonize Beijing, which in fact risks undermining the EU’s push for a common policy toward China and perpetuating a situation where member states look out mainly for their own interests, often to the detriment of a common European front. For now, the Leipzig summit has been postponed indefinitely due to the lack of progress with China.

For the past three years, the EU has embarked on a more realistic approach to China. It has pushed for a better coordination and defence over economic issues, including FDIs, state-aid and technology transfers. Not only did the European Commission create a new FDI screening mechanism, to be operational in October, but it has also issued guidelines on 5G technology and a white paper on foreign subsidies. In addition, it launched a connectivity strategy with the hope of offering a European alternative to China’s “Belt and Road Initiative.”

The year 2019 was considered by many as turning point in the EU’s bilateral relations with China, with the publication in March of a EU-China Strategic Outlook which labeled China a “systemic rival.” The virtual summit between Xi Jinping and Ursula von der Leyen eventually took place, but the lack of progress has created a growing frustration among European leaders, following a significant propaganda effort from Beijing to promote its agenda, including its handling of the pandemic, through social media and Chinese embassy websites. This “battle of narratives” was directly addressed by High representative for foreign affairs Josep Borrell on several occasions. A special report on disinformation was even produced by the European External Action Service. In her recent statement, von der Leyen also alluded to the Commission’s growing concerns over “cyber-attacks on computing systems and hospitals.” In the follow-up interview on French radio, she added that the EU “expects the same access to the Chinese market as the Chinese have in Europe”. In other words, reciprocity has become indispensable in order to move forward with an investment treaty and a more balanced relationship.

The tougher discourse from Brussels is a far-cry from the Trump Administration’s hard-line, as the latter has been accompanied by trade sanctions and restrictions against Chinese companies on US soil, including Huawei. The current language from Washington may not be very diplomatic, but it also reflects Capitol Hills’ bipartisan and hawkish approach and has led US allies – including a majority of Europeans – to reassert their approach to China’s rise. From either side of the Atlantic, it is unlikely that major moves will take place between now and the November presidential election. Should Joe Biden be elected president, some changes could be expected leading to a more transatlantic approach. As for China, it ultimately sees its relationship with the US as its number one priority, which explains Beijing’s current wait-and-see stance.

 


Source:Ocnus.net 2020

Top of Page

Defence & Arms
Latest Headlines
What Is Russia's Vagner Paramilitary Group and What Was It Doing in Belarus ahead of Vote?
Air Defense: Taiwan Gets A Refresh
Morale: Terrifying Reliability Reality
Challenges of Egypt’s Military Strategy in Sinai
Iran tows simulated U.S. aircraft carrier into Strait of Hormuz
Turkish Airpower has a Fifth Generation Aircraft Problem
Warplanes: StarLiner STANAG 4671
Counter-Terrorism: C-RAM Deja Vu
China military watch
Weapons: Video Gamer Special