Ocnus.Net
News Before It's News
About us | Ocnus? |

Front Page 
 
 Africa
 
 Analyses
 
 Business
 
 Dark Side
 
 Defence & Arms
 
 Dysfunctions
 
 Editorial
 
 International
 
 Labour
 
 Light Side
 
 Research
Search

Dysfunctions Last Updated: Aug 27, 2008 - 11:27:47 AM


Gone To Base
By Ruslan Gorevoi, Versiya 25/8/08
Aug 27, 2008 - 11:01:48 AM

Email this article
 Printer friendly page
Keeping an eye on geopolitical parity is one duty Moscow never shirks nowadays. Of course, it could adopt a different pattern of behavior and succumb to Washington's every demand the way Yugoslavia once did. What this compliance cost Yugoslavia is common knowledge. First, all republics were encouraged to cede and leave Serbia all alone. Second, the West left Serbia without its own ancestral lands of Kosovo and Metochia. Even that is not all, or so it seems.

With President Boris Tadic studiously looking the other way, all of Serbia may be restricted to Belgrade city limits soon. The Serbian way of non- resistance to the bullying West is not for Russia. It follows that something has to be done. Response to appearance of the American ABM defense system in the Czech Republic and Poland should take the form of an increased military presence of Russia in Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, and Kyrgyzstan and also in Georgia, Ukraine, Moldova, and Belarus. As well as in Syria, Cuba, and Venezuela. (With Belarus, everything is clear since we will form a union with this country one fine day.)

Military experts say that these measures will neutralize the American ABM defense system in Poland whose efficiency is going to be marginal in any event. This system kills one missile out of five on its lucky day and never even sees guided missiles with nuclear warheads. President of Moldova Vladimir Voronin was demanding Russian peacekeepers' withdrawal from the Trans-Dniester region and their replacement with an international contingent barely a year ago. It took Deputy Premier Sergei Ivanov a great deal of patience and persuasion to convince Voronin to learn to live up with the idea that Russia would retain its presence in the region as long as assets of the 14th Army remained there. As a matter of fact, Russia was supposed to withdraw all of that from the region seven years ago, in keeping with the Istanbul Accords (1999).

On the other hand, withdrawal from the Trans-Dniester region would have meant leaving the self-proclaimed republic on its own and depriving itself of a chance to establish a military base there one fine day. Now that Ukrainian President Victor Yuschenko reached an agreement with his Romanian counterpart Traian Basescu to settle the Trans-Dniester conflict without Moldova, Voronin has a chance (and the time) to authorize an increase of the numerical strength of the Russian peacekeeping contingent in the region and permit establishment of Russian military bases just about anywhere in Moldova. Russian peacekeepers in the Trans-Dniester region number almost 1,000 men these days (two motorized infantry battalions, battalion of guards, helicopter unit, and several auxiliary companies).

The contingent is to be increased to brigade's size soon. Also importantly, the reinforced contingent will help Moldova itself with its national security. Restoration of Russia's military presence in Central Asia began in Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, and Tajikistan. Return to these post-Soviet republics was anything but easy and unproblematic, thanks to NATO. Return to Uzbekistan was particularly difficult. President Islam Karimov was one of the initiators of the anti- Russian GUUAM (an alliance of Georgia, Uzbekistan, Ukraine, Azerbaijan, and Moldova). Moreover, one of the first US military bases in the post-Soviet zone was established precisely in Uzbekistan (in Khanabad). Karimov even did his best to keep the Russian military out of Kyrgyzstan, so that a major conflict between Moscow and Tashkent was barely averted in 2001. In any event, Karimov and Voronin reconsidered their options. Islamic gunmen provoked several border incidents several years ago. The Uzbeks turned to the United States for help but Washington chose to remain deaf to all requests.

Uzbek secret services in the meanwhile came by the documents proving that the gunmen had aimed to seize Samarkand and Bukhara and - which was particularly piquant - that they had elicited promises of non- involvement from the Americans. Karimov did not forgive the Americans. He ousted them from Uzbekistan in 2005 and invited the Russians to the former US AF base a year later. Official Tashkent severed ties with the Americans and withdrew from GUUAM. More or less analogous metamorphoses occurred in Kyrgyzstan too.

Reassuring Moscow of his goodwill and readiness to advance relations with it, President Askar Akayev did what he could to prevent transfer of the airfield in Kant to the Russians. At the same time, he did not exactly object to the American expansion into Central Asia so that the US AF established its airbase in Manas right near the capital city of Bishkek in 2002. Once the AF base was established, Islamic fanatics launched their attacks - just the way it had been in Uzbekistan nearby. Moreover, Akayev was hard pressed by existence of unsolved territorial disputes with Uzbekistan and Tajikistan, ones he couldn't hope to settle on his own. Claiming to want "parity" in the country, Akayev authorized establishment of a Russian military base. It was established in 2003 (Russia has SU-25 ground-strafers based there). As for Akayev, he told the Americans to vacate the premises in spring 2005 - the way Karimov had done before him. When Kurmanbek Bakiyev was elected the president of Kyrgyzstan, the Russian military solidified its positions in this country. Russia has several other military objects in Kyrgyzstan these days - torpedo testing center, long-range communications center, and seismic station working for the Russian Strategic Missile Forces. It is necessary to add that Russian military presence meets long-term interests of Central Asian republics.

The Tajik Pamir are Kyrgyz-populated. Samarkand and Bukhara in the southern part of Uzbekistan are Tajik-populated. There are four Uzbek enclaves on the territory of Kyrgyzstan. State borders actually exist on paper because Central Asian states cannot maintain their integrity. Skirmishes between border guards are not exactly unheard-of (one involving Uzbek and Tajik border guards was reported only recently). There is Afghanistan nearby, a major pain in the neck. Islamic fundamentalists cross the borders without hindrance, ferrying into Central Asia weapons, drugs, and ideology. All hopes are pinned on the Russian military, particularly in Tajikistan. President Emomali Rakhmonov kept stalling for time in the matter of permitting a Russian military base in Tajikistan when his country's national security was maintained by Russian border guards' presence. All of that ended in December 2004 when Russia withdrew its border guards and left Tajikistan facing the task of securing its own borders. It did not take official Dushanbe long to realize the scope of problems it was facing with Russian border guards gone and nobody to turn to for assistance. Russia ended up owner of the Nurek electronic center in less than a month.

Its 201st Motorized Infantry Division posted in Tajikistan was developed into a fully-fledged military base. These days, three Russian regiments are quartered in Dushanbe, Kulyab, and Kurgan-Tyube. By way of military presence in Tajikistan, Russia also has a battery of Grad multiple rocket launchers, AF group (five SU-25s), helicopter wing, antiaircraft missile regiment, regiment of self-propelled artillery pieces, and a regiment of jammers. Nearly 8,000 men strong, the Russian military contingent includes 100 tanks and 300 infantry fighting vehicles and armored personnel carriers. Also importantly, Tajikistan does not even demand a rent for the military base. Georgia's reckless foray into South Ossetia offered Moscow additional opportunities even in this region that seemed lost to its influence forever. President of South Ossetia Eduard Kokoity has already authorized establishment of a major military base, and his Abkhazian counterpart Sergei Bagapsh is expected to follow suit in the immediate future.

Political situation being what it is, Russian military presence in the region will ensure its security in the Caucasus and serve as a counterweight to American presence. The situation in Uzbekistan and Kyrgyzstan in the meanwhile may repeat itself again in Azerbaijan. President Ilham Aliyev will probably be re-elected but the Americans seem to be backing the Azerbaijani opposition rather than their protege. There are no guarantees at all that Aliyev will tolerate it. In fact, he is likely to do what his Uzbek and Kyrgyz colleagues did. In the meantime, there is an obstacle to the Russian-Azerbaijani rapprochement, one by name of Yerevan. Two years ago, Azerbaijani Defense Minister Safar Abiyev declared his country ready "to take every conceivable measure to restore territorial integrity and control over Nagorno-Karabakh", and relations between Moscow and Baku plummeted. Russian then Defense Minister Sergei Ivanov proclaimed Moscow ready to dispatch its military to Stepanakert (the capital of Nagorno-Karabakh).

In fact, Ivanov repeated the offer to Stepanakert a year later. Official Baku was understandably upset then. It is probably different, these days. Aliyev may put up with deployment of the Russian military in Stepanakert and with other, even more resolute, steps now. In any event, Russian military analysts anticipate establishment of a Russian military base in Azerbaijan in a foreseeable future - on Aliyev's request. In other words, the Russian military returned to the borders of the erstwhile USSR and established a security belt along the Russian perimeter. Leaders of Venezuela, Cuba, and Syria offer territories of their countries for Russian military bases too. It is going to put Russia in a position where it will be able to make a lot of problems for the United States in the Middle East and Latin America. Sure, it is not going to endear Russia to Europe or America, but it will allow for at least a semblance of military parity. Also importantly, this expansion promises Russia both foreign political dividends and purely economic ones. Control is frequently more rewarding than actual possession.


Source:Ocnus.net 2008

Top of Page

Dysfunctions
Latest Headlines
Economy Drives Away Young Professionals
China Seeks to Curb Unrest
World Bank Sees Grim Year Ahead
Making a Jester Out of Medvedev
Parti Socialiste - La guerre des roses
Armenia: Uranium Exploration Plans Provoke Fears
Medvedev Sorted Out the EU but Got Lost at the G-20
Medvedev Learned His PR Skills From Chavez
Fatah-Hamas Chasm Won't End Soon
Russia's Man in the EU