Ocnus.Net
News Before It's News
About us | Ocnus? |

Front Page 
 
 Africa
 
 Analyses
 
 Business
 
 Dark Side
 
 Defence & Arms
 
 Dysfunctions
 
 Editorial
 
 International
 
 Labour
 
 Light Side
 
 Research
Search

Dysfunctions Last Updated: Nov 16, 2021 - 11:17:56 AM


Sea Transportation: Explosive Revelations
By Strategy Page, November 16, 2021
Nov 16, 2021 - 11:16:46 AM

Email this article
 Printer friendly page

A Chinese naval officer recently gave an interview in which he described how the navy was testing the effect of underwater explosives set off in ports. Apparently, China recently conducted a test of the concept in an unidentified Chinese port that had to be largely empty for such a test because the navy reported that key piers and other facilities were damaged or destroyed by the shock wave generated by the explosion.

 

Such tactics were discussed and studied during the Cold War when it was believed the Soviet Union could get such a bomb, apparently nuclear, into enemy ports before war broke out and somehow kept hidden until remotely detonated. This was more a result of Cold War paranoia than useful tactics. It was concluded that the Soviets could get such devices in, and out of enemy ports on a regular basis but hiding the devices in a foreign port was not seen as practical or safe.

The situation may be substantially different now because a side effect of Chinas rapid economic growth has been Chinese port management firms exporting their expertise, often after a Chinese firm has purchased a controlling interest in a foreign port and brings in a Chinese port management company. This gives China a lot of control over what goes on in the port, even though local port police and port operation officials are still present.

Another change is that China now has large force of short-range ballistic missiles, some of them transported and launched from trucks, or railroad cars. These missiles have conventional warheads that are designed for special tasks, like destroying runways or penetrating the ground to destroy command or other bunkers. Conventional warheads can also be built to detonate underwater to do maximum damage with the resulting shockwave. This is what depth charges and some types of torpedo warheads do. This is a more likely reason for the “explosions in a port” test because enough non-nuclear warheads delivered by ballistic missiles used early in a war could cripple enough commercial and military ports to disrupt enemy naval operations and seaborne trade in general.


Source:Ocnus.net 2021

Top of Page

Dysfunctions
Latest Headlines
Philippines: Old Families Strike Back
The spectre of war looms over Bosnia again
Mercenaries and private military security: Africa’s thin grey line
Korea: Hungry Soldiers Threaten The North
Balochistan: Systematic Annihilation
Underground network of spies helped Taliban score decisive victory in Afghanistan
Russia-Mali: Who is spreading Moscow’s soft power in Bamako?
Turkey Reverses Syria Incursion Plans after Russian and US Pressure
Moscow Worried by Ankara’s Expansive Vision of ‘Turkic World’
Sea Transportation: Explosive Revelations