Ocnus.Net
Erectile Dysfunction in Abidjan
By Dr. gary K. Busch 29/4/09
Apr 30, 2009 - 9:30:54 AM
According to the
representative of
the Ivory Coast in the United Nations there will definitely be an
election for
President and the National Assembly of the country this year; in
December. The
UN officials have reiterated that these elections must take place this
time and
not be postponed. All the worthies of the African Union and ECOWAS have
declared their support for this date. The leaders of the European Union
and the
US have pledged themselves to achieving this election event. It even
has
support among the young voters of the country who have held
demonstrations, fasts
and marches in support of the elections.
The government has gone
into debt to
pay the French company, SAGEM, to prepare the voting lists and identify
who is
an Ivorian and entitled to vote. Over six million of the eight million
potential voters have been ‘indentified’. Over twenty billion CFA
francs
(US$39.5 million) for materials, training and other electoral
operations have
been paid already. Despite this registration workers are and have been
on
strike for lack of pay. They have been threatened and abused and many
observers, especially among the FPI youth say that some of these
‘indentified’
people are actually foreigners.
What no one seems to have
addressed is
the fundamental question of the reunification of the country in advance
of the
election. The rebellion split the country in 2002. The North, where the
rebels
live, has been governed by tin pot warlords with no semblance of any
civic responsibility.
There has been virtually no education taking place in the North. There
are no
banks. There are no hospitals. Taxes aren’t collected. Rents aren’t
paid. On
average about under half of Côte d’Ivoire’s 20 million people now live
below
the poverty threshold, on less than about US$1.25 per day; the worst
level in
20 years, according to results released by the national statistics
institute
(INS) on 27 November, 2008. According to the INS 70 percent of
Ivoirians have
difficulty eating adequately and 68 percent cannot afford proper
treatment when
ill.
The poor of the South
support the
poor of the North while the rich of both areas seem to be immune to
their cries
for help or justice. The key to the reunification has been the need for
disarmament. This has happened sporadically and the monies which were
due to be
paid (three lots of US $200 per disarmed fighter) have not all been
paid. The rabble
of the Northern rebels, loosely defined as New Forces, has kept their
disarmed
weapons near at hand. They have their man, Soro, imposed as Prime
Minister but
are unhappy with him as they feel he is a “careerist”. There was an
abortive
attack on his plane a while ago and there have been frequent threats
against
him since.
The fundamental problem is
that there
has been a collapse of the political will to resolve these conflicts.
Until
March 2007 when the contesting parties met in Ouagadougou to sign the
Ouagadougou Accord which has formed the basis of the current political
structure, the North and the South were at least demonstrating that
they had a
point of view. After Ouagadougou the conflict of ideas and political
initiatives were subsumed in a frenzy of co-operation and
collaboration. The
situation, viewed historically, is patently absurd.
The rebels tried to
overthrow the legitimate,
elected government of Gbagbo by a military coup. They were encouraged,
supported, protected and guided in this by France. They were aided by
weapons
supplied to them by the French and Libyans delivered to the rebels
through
Burkina Faso. The insurgents were aided by fighters supplied by the
former
insurgents from Liberia and Sierra Leone paid for by the French. The
hub of this
intervention was Burkina Faso and was led and guided by its President,
Blaise Campaore
who had done the same in the wars in Liberia and Sierra Leone. Soro was
his
creation and he was the patron of what became the New Forces. The
French troops
in the country, later supplemented by UN peacekeepers maintained the
division
of the country into North and South and kept the rebels alive and well,
even
after they had lost the rebellion.
Even after the imposed
division of
the country the French continued to plan coups against the South and
used their
power to crush civil unrest. In November 2004 they massacred 65
innocent,
unarmed civilians at the Hotel d’Ivoire and injured hundreds more. They
then
tried, unsuccessfully, to dissolve the National Assembly. The French
military
and commercial presence effectively made any local political
initiatives by the
South, or the North ineffective. The politics of the Ivory Coast was
the
politics of impotence.
It is difficult to believe
that the
path towards this upcoming election was fostered by a series of
meetings called
in Ouagadougou by the President of Burkina Faso, Blaise Campaore. This,
as yet
unindicted, war criminal who has suborned the rebellion; nurtured it;
and who
grew wealthy from it was suddenly a peacemaker. His creature, Soro, was
put in
as Prime Minister. The Cabinet posts were divided among the losers of
the
rebellion along with the legitimate ministers of the FPI. This formed
the new government
in the post-Ouagadougou era. Even more preposterously, the rebels
demanded to
be integrated into the national army and to receive back pay for their
period
of rebellion against their government. This monstrous demand was
actually treated
seriously.
Now there is a government,
made up of
a mixed cabinet formed from mongrel parties and totally incapable of
uniting on
any coherent economic, social or political policy. There is an army of
mixed
rebels and loyalists who do not take orders from a central command;
further
enfeebled by constant stories of plots and coups. The New Forces are
still
unhappy with Soro and they threaten him regularly.
The only people who are
happy are the
French. They have reasserted their neo-colonial hold over the country.
Their
businesses have returned in force to the Ivory Coast and control over
65% of
the commerce. The United Nations pays for most of the peacekeeping
troops,
including the French peacekeepers. The nations of the European
Community are
helping subsidise the ‘identification’ process which puts millions into
the
hands of a French company. The rise of the French has completed the
detumescence of the national power. The Ivoirians of the North and the
South are
impotent and there is nothing in the coming election which appears
likely to
cure their erectile dysfunction.
Until there is actual
disarmament and
the reunification of the country which will be combined with the return
of
government services to the North and the participation of the North in
contributing to the national coffers these elections will be
meaningless. As long
as the French can maintain their control over the levers of power in
the
country the national impotence has no cure.
Source: Ocnus.net 2009