A few days ago the
government of
Nigeria was host to Dimitry Medvedev, the President of Russia, and a
large
delegation of his advisors. While they were meeting they signed a
number of
agreements and protocols on nuclear energy, transfer of prisoners,
investment
promotion and cooperation on legal matters. They signed a Memorandum of
Understanding on co-operation in the field of exploration of outer
space and a joint
venture between Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) and the
Russian
state gas monopoly Gazprom. There were agreements made on the takeover
by the
Russians of the railway project; the renovation of the Ajeokuta steel
mill, and
the building of a gas pipeline from the Delta to the North. Further
agreements
included the joint venture to exploit Nigeria’s large reserves of
uranium.
This sounds as if it
will be
profitable for Nigeria and will see the massive influx of developmental
cash
into the economy. It is a plausible conclusion for anyone to draw who
has no
knowledge of the fairly desperate state of the Russian economy. The
World Bank
has just issued its Report 19 on Russia the same day that the deals
were signed
in Abuja. Its highlights include:
“
Economic
and social deterioration in the
first five months of 2009 has been deeper than expected just a few
months ago.
Real GDP is estimated to have dropped by more than 10 percent,
unemployment
reached close to 10 percent, and the poverty rate rose dramatically.
*
Given a much larger GDP contraction in the
first two quarters of 2009 than anticipated, Russia's economy is now
likely to
contract by 7.9 percent in 2009, despite higher oil prices assumed in
the
current forecast. Most of the adverse impact in Russia is concentrated
in the
first two quarters of 2009. Depressed export demand, tight credits,
declining
investment, and compressed consumption will remain the major factors of
output
contraction this year. The speed of the subsequent recovery in Russia
will
likely be slow, dependent on the revival of the global demand and
global
financial system.
*
Looking into the medium term, with the
current growth profile, real GDP levels in Russia will reach the
pre-crisis
high only at the end of the third quarter of 2012. Thus, economic
recovery is
likely to be very gradual and prolonged.
*
The financial crisis has significantly
worsened not only poverty, but also the entire income distribution in
Russia. A
deeper-than-expected drop in real GDP of 7.9 percent in 2009 is causing
huge
changes in the composition of wealth and the overall income
distribution. The
share of the poor will rise from 13.2 percent before the crisis, to
17.4
percent by year's-end. And the share of the vulnerable population will
increase
to 20.9 percent in comparison to 18.3 percent previously (an increase
of 3.6
million people).
*
The Russian middle class measured in
terms of household consumption is likely to shrink - by about 10
percent - from
55.6 percent to 51.2 percent (a decline of 6.2 million people).( World
Bank's
Russian Economic Report No. 19 24/6/09)
On June 22, Russia's
rouble-denominated
MICEX Index dropped 7.8 percent to 937.98, bringing its decline since
June 1 to
22 percent. The dollar-denominated RTS Index declined by 4.98 percent
to
961.04. On the same day the World Bank said it expected the Russian
economy to
contract by 7.5 percent this year (www.top.rbc.ru, June 22). The
economic
crisis is clearly deepening, since the decline of Russian industrial
output
accelerated by 17.1 percent in May compared with 16.9 percent in April.
Experts
admit that even rising oil prices will hardly help the inefficient
Russian
economy.
The much-vaunted
Russian recovery
plan isn’t working very well despite Medvedev’s cheerleading. Gazprom
is not
doing much better. Data from the International Energy Agency showed
last week
that Gazprom's market share in Europe and Turkey plunged to 16 percent
in the
first quarter of this year, compared with 30 percent last summer.
European
customers preferred buying cheaper LNG in spot trading from Gazprom's
competitors because contracts with the Russian company fix prices for
pipeline
gas to those of oil six to nine months ago, when it hovered at
record-high
levels. Russia's reputation as a gas exporter also took a hit in
January, when
a dispute over supplies and transit in Ukraine led to widespread
shortages
throughout much of Europe. Gazprom exported to Europe just 74 percent
of what
it planned to in the first half of this year, or 59.5 billion cubic
meters. (Anatoly
Medetsky, Moscow Times 25/6/09). Gazprom has immense reserves of
natural gas in
the new Sakhalin plants and with the development of the Stockman gas
deposit
located in the central part of the Barents Sea. Its stocks are
estimated at 3.2
billion cubic metres of gas and 31 million tonnes of condensate.
Gazprom doesn’t
have the resources available to develop its own gas fields on its own
and is
desperately trying to set up deals with the oil majors. How is it going
to
develop Nigeria’s gas fields? Gazprom is Nigeria’s competitor in the
international gas business not its ally. Nigeria already has five gas
trains
working producing LNG for which there is a growing market, especially
in Europe
trying to avoid the energy blackmail of Russia during its disputes with
the
Ukraine.
The NNPC is deluding
itself when
it rejoices over the Russian (Lukoil) proposed investment in crude
production.
Oil Minister Rilwanu Lukman
(former OPEC Secretary General) said. "Nigeria produces 2 million
barrels
of oil per day. With Russia's help, we hope to double the output. At
the very
least, we hope to make it 3 million barrels per day." Lukman doesn’t
mention that current production is 1.05 million barrels a day and
falling; nor
that Nigeria is part of OPEC and the notion of OPEC allowing Nigeria to
produce
4 million barrels a day is fanciful at best in this market.
The idea of building
a gas
pipeline in Nigeria from the Delta to the North is a politically blind
decision. The Delta states have been having a hard enough time getting
their
13% derivation from the Northern bosses for existing production.
Setting up a
direct gas line from the Delta to the North is likely to be setting up
a permanent
target for the Delta militants to attack.
For anyone with a
memory Nigeria’s
experience with the Russian-built steel mill at Ajeokuta which was
supposed to become
the largest metal producing plant in Africa raises many issues.. The
building of the steel
plant
started in 1970 during the Soviet era.
The
whole project fell apart in the 1980s and
is ‘‘a painful topic in discussions among Nigerian policy experts on
Russian-Nigerian relations’’. (IPS 23/3/09). A brief and unsuccessful
interlude
with the Indians did not advance the project so Nigeria is trying “hair
of the
dog” solution to the failure of Ajeokuta. This reliance fails to
understand the
deeply depressed nature of the international iron and steel industry
and the
failure of Russian steel mills to thrive or even survive. One of
Russia’s
largest steel businesses has just issued a warning of its imminent
failure to trade
as a “going concern” As Reuters reported on 25/6/09 “Debt-saddled steel
and
coking coal producer Mechel on Wednesday raised major doubts about its
future
as a going concern. Top Russian steel producers borrowed more than $30
billion
to make acquisitions and increase production during the precrisis boom,
and
Mechel is one of the most indebted, with total debt of $5.4 billion as
of Dec.
31. There is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going
concern," the company wrote in a key filing with the U.S. Securities
and
Exchange Commission. Mechel has breached covenants on $4.2 billion of
loans,
forcing it to -reclassify most of its debt as shirt-term. Are these the
people
to save Nigeria’s steel business?
Perhaps the only
truly positive outcome
of this visit is the agreement between Nigeria and Russia to jointly
work on
the exploration of space. It will be a wonderful thing if there are
Nigerian
cosmonauts who can escape the confines of the planet and search the
ether for
Nigeria’s missing satellite.