Ocnus.Net
News Before It's News
About us | Ocnus? |

Front Page 
 
 Africa
 
 Analyses
 
 Business
 
 Dark Side
 
 Defence & Arms
 
 Dysfunctions
 
 Editorial
 
 International
 
 Labour
 
 Light Side
 
 Research
Search

International Last Updated: Sep 15, 2019 - 11:08:17 AM


The Road to Peace in Afghanistan Passes Through China
By Mat Nashed, OZY 9/9/19
Sep 12, 2019 - 2:00:17 PM

Email this article
 Printer friendly page

Why you should car? China alone has the clout with all major players in Afghanistan to push for peace.

After the Longest War: What's next in Afghanistan?


When Abdul Ghani Baradar, head of the Taliban’s political office in Qatar, touched down in Beijing in June, he and 12 of his colleagues were greeted by Chinese officials and treated like state guests. China is rounding up millions of its own Uighur Muslims and locking them up in internment camps. For the Taliban, though, Beijing rolled out the red carpet.

China only announced the visit by the Taliban after the team headed by Baradar had left the country, and still hasn’t revealed who represented Beijing in those talks. But days later, the U.S. Special Representative for Afghanistan Reconciliation Zalmay Khalilzad announced that his latest negotiations with the Taliban had been his most successful yet. Khalilzad then flew to China for a meeting later that month.

For the moment, talks with the Taliban are off after President Donald Trump stopped negotiations on Saturday following attacks by the group last week. But the sequence of events in June is part of increasing evidence pointing to China’s growing role as the country that is best placed to play guarantor of any future stability in Afghanistan. In April, Beijing joined Washington and Moscow in calling for the Taliban to return to talks after a communications breakdown. Then in July, China persuaded Pakistan — a longtime backer of the Taliban — to support that call.

Trade tensions between Washington and Beijing make cooperation between them complex, says Barnett Rubin, a leading expert on Afghanistan from New York University. Yet whenever America’s peace talks with the Taliban resume, experts say that China will have a central role. Of the world’s major powers, no other country can match China’s clout with both the elected government of Afghanistan and with Pakistan [and therefore, with the Taliban]. China is the biggest investor in Afghanistan — $3.5 billion since 2005, according to the American Enterprise Institute. And while relations between the U.S. and Pakistan are strained — Trump last November tweeted that its former Cold War ally had “not done a damn thing for us” — Beijing is today Islamabad’s biggest economic and military benefactor. It has invested more than $60 billion in Pakistan, where a highway connecting the port of Gwadar to Xinjiang in China is the centerpiece of President Xi Jinping’s Belt and Road Initiative. Those investments in both countries are also what gives China the impetus to try and fill any power vacuum to safeguard its regional economic and security interests.

Still, there are limitations to what China can do, which have been on display. Before canceling peace talks, the U.S. was urging China to press Pakistan to get the Taliban into the same room as Afghan officials. But the Taliban still rejects formal talks with the Afghan government, accusing it of being an American puppet. China’s investments in Pakistan — and their centrality to the BRI more broadly — are a double-edged sword: They also give Islamabad leverage over Beijing, which doesn’t want to upset such a vital partner too much. And when Washington was a major partner of Islamabad, for several years it tried to get Pakistan to change course on the Taliban, without success. For Pakistan, the Taliban represents a vital insurance policy against the influence of India in Afghanistan, where elected governments have tended to lean toward New Delhi. To expect Pakistan to dump the Taliban at the behest of China would be naive, say some analysts.

“Pakistan will always act in its own interests before it acts in the interests of anyone else,” says Aziz Rafiee, an Afghan activist and executive director of the Afghan Civil Society Forum.

But Pakistan today is far more dependent economically on China than it ever was on America. Beijing has in recent months shown that it does wield some influence over Islamabad on its approach with extremists. In May, China joined the rest of the U.N. Security Council in sanctioning Masood Azhar, the Pakistan-based terrorist who brought Islamabad and New Delhi to the brink of war earlier this year following an attack in Kashmir. China had earlier blocked such efforts at proscribing Azhar. Since the U.N. action, Pakistan has arrested several other militants accused of terrorism by India and the U.S.

Beijing is also making inroads with the Taliban to prevent an all-out war from spilling into Pakistan and Central Asia. Often, powers promise aid in exchange for a cessation of hostilities, but China has historically had a different approach, and that’s set to grow. “China prioritizes commercial investments and has never used aid as a carrot to dangle in front of parties to stop the violence,” says Raghav Sharma, director of Afghanistan studies at the Jindal School of International Affairs. China already has contracts to copper mines 25 miles from Kabul and oil in the north.

Sharma expects China to also strengthen the financing for Afghan anti-narcotics units and Afghan border patrols to ensure any violence stays contained within the country’s borders. China says it is worried that Afghanistan could serve as a haven for the East Turkestan Islamic Movement (ETIM) — which it accused of terrorism in Xinjiang — if the country collapses, a threat that Sharma believes is overstated. “I think China just uses the ETIM card to justify the persecution of its own Uighur Muslim population,” he says.

There’s no exaggeration when it comes to the presence of terrorist groups such as the Islamic State group in Afghanistan though, and that’s a cause for concern for both China and the U.S. The Taliban also continues to terrorize civilians and seize territory, all in a bid to improve its bargaining position in negotiations. But that plan backfired when Trump abruptly canceled peace talks just three days before the anniversary of 9/11, citing the death of an American soldier on Thursday as inexcusable. “What kind of people would kill so many people to strengthen their bargaining position,” the president tweeted. “They didn’t. They only made it worse.”

With talks now off, some Afghans are relieved that U.S. troops won’t pull out so soon. But whenever they do, Afghans fear the violence will worsen unless China assumes a larger role in appeasing rival parties. “Any power vacuum in Afghanistan will affect neighboring countries because there is no way the bloodshed can be contained,” stresses Omaid Sharifi, a peace activist in Kabul. “That’s why Afghans hope China steps up because we know they have interests in the region.”


Source:Ocnus.net 2019

Top of Page

International
Latest Headlines
Counter-Terrorism: Scary People
The Return of the Pakistani Taliban
Pour Erdogan, un succès stratégique
Moscow Now Says Montreux Convention Vital to Defense of Yalta-Potsdam World
Austria elections: can far-right return to power despite video scandal?
Steinmeier’s Formula: Its Background and Development in the Normandy and Minsk Processes
A historical perspective on China’s southward advance
Divide Britain
China In The Middle East: Reshaping Regional Politics
Why Imran Khan's 'Kashmir Hour' Fell Flat