Ocnus.Net
News Before It's News
About us | Ocnus? |

Front Page 
 
 Africa
 
 Analyses
 
 Business
 
 Dark Side
 
 Defence & Arms
 
 Dysfunctions
 
 Editorial
 
 International
 
 Labour
 
 Light Side
 
 Research
Search

Labour Last Updated: Jul 8, 2019 - 9:52:01 AM


Trump NLRB Eliminates Hurdle to Employers Kicking Out Unions
By Bloomberg, July 4, 2019
Jul 7, 2019 - 10:09:06 AM

Email this article
 Printer friendly page

Ruling eases process for “anticipatory withdrawal” of union recognition; replaces unfair labor practice process with call for new election

The National Labor Relations Board made it easier for an employer to oust a union after getting evidence that a majority of workers no longer supports that union.

The NLRB’s Republican majority modified the board’s legal framework for an employer to stop bargaining prior to the expiration of a collective bargaining agreement and announce it will eject the union when that contract ends. Under the board’s July 3 ruling, an employer that makes such an “anticipatory withdrawal” can’t be hit with an unfair labor practice charge challenging whether the union really lacked majority support when the contract ended.

An employer can announce its pending withdrawal of recognition within 90 days of the expiration of a contract and then withdraw when the pact ends, according to the ruling. A union that wants to reestablish its majority status following an employer’s anticipatory withdrawal then has 45 days to file a petition for a new election.

The ruling fits with the NLRB’s ongoing efforts to make it easier for dissatisfied workers to kick out their unions. GOP board members have said they’re open to reconsidering current precedent on when workers can oust their union. The board also is considering changes to other restrictions on elections to decertify unions.

The board’s 3-1 decision signed off on Johnson Controls Inc.'s anticipatory withdrawal of recognition to a United Auto Workers affiliate that represented 160 of its workers.

By overturning portions of its 2001 ruling in Levitz Furniture, the board said its ruling protected employee free choice.

“It ends the unsatisfactory process of attempting to resolve conflicting evidence of employees’ sentiments concerning representation in unfair labor practice cases,” the board said. “Instead, such issues will be resolved as they should be: through an election, the preferred method for determining employees’ representational preferences.”

The board said it will apply the new framework for anticipatory withdrawals retroactively.

But Lauren McFerran, the board’s only Democratic member, said the decision allows an employer to withdraw recognition “in the face of objective evidence that the union has not lost majority support among the employees it represents” and instead requires a new election.

“Disregarding the union’s continuing presumption of majority support and dismissing the union’s rebuttal evidence as immaterial, the employer is now permitted to oust the union as the employees’ bargaining representative the second the contract expires—and the union remains ousted, unless and until it seeks and wins a Board election,” McFerran said in her dissent.

The case is Johnston Controls, N.L.R.B., 10-CA-151843, 7/3/19.


Source:Ocnus.net 2019

Top of Page

Labour
Latest Headlines
‘Prepare For Indefinite Strike’ – NLC Tells Workers
The Ghost of Jimmy Hoffa Won’t Go Away
Zwelinzima Vavi interview: Why trade unions are against Mboweni’s growth document
White collar staff at Hanergy join the ranks of workers protesting wage arrears
Film Explores Mystery of Latina Union Leader Who Disappeared
German workers voice support for US GM strike
GM dumped health care for striking workers. That poured gas on fire, expert says
Labour starts to reverse Tony Blair’s Clause 4 reforms
GM stops paying for health insurance for striking union workers
The Real Reason General Motors Workers Are On Strike Nationwide