Ocnus.Net
News Before It's News
About us | Ocnus? |

Front Page 
 
 Africa
 
 Analyses
 
 Business
 
 Dark Side
 
 Defence & Arms
 
 Dysfunctions
 
 Editorial
 
 International
 
 Labour
 
 Light Side
 
 Research
Search

Labour Last Updated: Jul 16, 2019 - 4:19:31 PM


Trump's NLRB: Employers May Now File Decerts
By Kris LaGrange, Ucommblog, July 13, 2019
Jul 14, 2019 - 11:18:00 AM

Email this article
 Printer friendly page

Trump’s NLRB has issued yet another decision that would make it easier for employers to decertify unions. This time the NLRB is streamlining the process for employers who “think” that the union has lost the support of a majority of their members.

Under the July 3rd decision an employer can make an “anticipatory withdrawal” without facing any penalties. All they would have to do is announce within 90 days of the expiration of the CBA that they are withdrawing recognition of their staff union. The onus would then be on the union to prove that they have a majority status. The union would then have 45 days to file for a new election.

Before this decision, an employer who attempted to contest the union’s support would have to prove that they had lost majority status and could face an unfair labor practice (ULP) charge if their assertion was found to be incorrect.  This led to most decertification campaigns collecting cards or signatures indicating that the employees intend to leave the union. The board has indicated that they will apply this new framework retroactively, meaning that other ULP charges could be thrown out.

This decision is yet another attempt by Trump’s NLRB to weaken labor laws in favor of big business. All that this will lead to is an increase in costly certification elections as employers challenge a union’s majority status. Republicans have tried this before, like in Iowa, only to find out that the vast majority of union members want to stick with their union.

This decision came just days after another NLRB decision that overturned a 38-year precedent known as the "public spaces exception." This rule allowed union representatives who were not employees of the company to access public spaces within the workplace. For example, a union official would be allowed to sit in the front of a restaurant and promote and/or solicit union membership to the employees, as long as they were not disruptive. The new NLRB decision says that employer doesn’t have to allow access to these public spaces, even if the area would normally be open to the general public. This basically means that if a union organizer talks union, the boss can now throw them off the premise.

Both of these decisions have one simple goal, to make it tougher and more expensive to organize a union and bargain a contract. Without penalties what is to stop every union employer in the country from filing a notice of “anticipatory withdrawal?” It’s likely they would win a few, but in the meantime, they would force the union to expend their finite resources on proving that they still had majority support in the workplace, instead of negotiating a new contract and defending members. Still happy you voted for Trump?


Source:Ocnus.net 2019

Top of Page

Labour
Latest Headlines
Labor Dept. proposes granting businesses with federal contracts 'religious exemption' in hiring
Some Labor Unions Split with Biden on 'Medicare for All'
Russia’s doctors fight for their right to be fallible
Canary in the Coal Mines
Is Burnout an Epidemic Among American Workers? Experts Are Divided
Unions Keep Watch on Corporations
Closures and pay cuts spark delivery driver protests in China
Kentucky Miners Are Camped Out on Railroad Tracks, Blocking a Coal Train, Demanding Their Stolen Wages
General strike by Hong Kong workers against extradition law
NLRB Rolls Back Workers Right to Concerted Activity