The Fed’s
decision in March to underwrite with $29 billion of its own funds the takeover
of investment bank Bear Stearns by JPMorgan Chase, in order to prevent the
collapse of Bear Stearns, and its even more extraordinary move to allow major
investment banks to avoid a similar fate by borrowing directly from its
coffers, was a signal that the US government would marshal whatever resources
were necessary to rescue the banking system from the consequences of the
speculative binge that had generated billions in salaries and bonuses for the
Wall Street elite.
While the
government bailout, ultimately to be financed from public funds, has seemingly
averted an immediate banking collapse, it has done nothing to address the
underlying crisis. Rather, the Fed and the US corporate-financial establishment
hope that it has created the conditions for a more orderly “deleveraging” of
the financial system, i.e., a liquidation of trillions in vastly inflated and
unmarketable assets, in which the social and economic pain is borne
overwhelmingly by working class and middle class families.
The Fed’s actions
have restored a measure of confidence to the financial markets, reflected in a
stock market rally that has driven the Dow Jones Industrial Average back toward
the 13,000 level. At the same time, the Fed and most financial analysts are
acknowledging that the US housing collapse and credit crunch have precipitated
an economic slowdown that will likely be protracted.
Addressing
a conference of the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta on Tuesday, Federal Reserve
Board Chairman Ben Bernanke said that financial markets were improving but
“remain far from normal.” He said the decision in March to allow investment
firms to obtain emergency loans from the Fed “seems to have bolstered
confidence.”
But, he
cautioned, the crisis would not be resolved quickly. “Ultimately,” he said,
“market participants themselves must address the fundamental sources of
financial strains through deleveraging, raising new capital and improving risk
management, and this process is likely to take some time.”
Whatever
the technical indices of the slump—not a few experts have taken to denying that
the US is in a recession or heading for one—ordinary working people in the
United States are suffering a major cut in their living standards. Job losses
are mounting, wages are declining, work hours are being reduced and prices for
essentials such as food and gasoline are soaring.
In a word,
the underlying historical and economic processes that produced the crisis on
Wall Street are making the vast majority of Americans poorer. And we are only
at the beginning of this process.
The impact
of the economic crisis on the general population was reflected in a
Washington
Post-ABC News
poll released Tuesday, which reported that 68 percent
of people surveyed said they were concerned about their ability to maintain
their standard of living. The biggest factor cited by respondents was the sharp
rise in consumer prices.
A separate
poll released by ABC showed economic anxiety to be at its highest point on
record since 1981.
In the
Post-ABC
poll, the nearly 70 percent who said they were worried about maintaining their
lifestyles represented a 17 percent jump since December of last year. The
growing anxiety reported by respondents cut across party and income lines,
“spreading rapidly among Republicans, people from rural areas and those from
middle- and upper-income households,” according to the
Post.
The
newspaper said that nearly six in ten people from households with an annual
income of $100,000 or higher said they were worried, up from a third in
December. Of those who identified themselves as Republicans, 56 percent
expressed concern, up from 32 percent.
Twenty
percent cited higher gasoline prices as the single most important economic
issue, and about a third pointed more generally to rising prices as the primary
cause of their apprehension. Two-thirds called rising gasoline prices a
financial hardship, including a third who said higher fuel prices were a severe
burden.
There is,
of course, a very real basis for these concerns. Just on the question of
gasoline, the Energy Department reported that the average cost of gas rose 11
cents in the past week alone, and has gone up 33 cents over the past month on
its way to over $4 a gallon.
According
to a report issued Wednesday by the Labor Department, food prices shot up 5.1
percent in April over a year earlier, and 0.9 percent from the previous month.
Both of these gains are the biggest since 1990. The spike in food prices was
propelled by increases in the price of bread, fruit, coffee and other consumer
staples.
Health care
costs have risen 4.3 percent in the past 12 months.
Prices for
imported goods—a direct reflection of the precipitous decline of the US
dollar—rose 1.8 percent in April from March. They have soared 15.4 percent from
last year, the biggest year-to-year increase since such records began to be
kept in 1982.
Meanwhile,
real weekly wages have fallen compared to a year earlier in every month since
October.
A major
component of the “deleveraging” process is an assault on jobs by means of
downsizing, restructuring and corporate bankruptcies. The last three months
have seen, according to the Labor Department, a net loss of 180,000 jobs in the
US. Aside from construction and manufacturing, where job cuts continue to
escalate, the financial sector is bearing the brunt of the job-cutting.
It is
estimated that so far this year 50,000 financial jobs have been slashed. More
than 23,000 financial-related US job cuts were announced in April, according to
the outplacement firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas. That increased the
total to 49,825 in the first four months of this year—nearly as many job cuts
as were announced in all of 2007.
This,
however, is only the first stage of what promises to be a far larger
job-slashing process. Last week, the Swiss bank UBS announced it will lay off
5,500 employees in the US and Britain. Lehman Brothers is expected to announce
that it is eliminating 5 percent of its employees, or about 1,425 positions, on
top of a previously announced 5 percent cutback in its work force.
By the end
of June, Morgan Stanley plans 1,500 more job cuts. This puts total layoffs at
Morgan Stanley at about 4,500, or 10 percent.
Citigroup
on May 9 announced a plan to shed up to $500 billion of assets and slash some $15
billion off its cost base. The bank did not say how many jobs would be
eliminated, but the figure will likely be in the tens of thousands. The bank
has already announced 13,000 job cuts.
The
crushing impact of job losses and price rises continues to undermine retail
sales. The Commerce Department reported Tuesday that retail sales fell another
0.2 percent in April from the previous month. This smaller-than-expected drop
obscures the dramatic slump in consumer spending in key manufacturing sectors.
Auto sales fell 2.8 percent in April, after a 0.5 percent drop in March.
The
Federal Reserve issued a report on US manufacturing Thursday which showed that
the slump in that critical sector is deepening. Industrial production declined
0.7 percent in April, more than twice the drop forecast by economists.
The
financial crisis is taking a growing toll in the form of corporate
bankruptcies. Corporate bankruptcy filings rose in the US last month more than
50 percent over the previous year’s figure.
In the
financial sector itself, losses from failed mortgage-related assets and bad
debts continue to mount, reflecting the underlying insolvency of major sections
of the financial system. Last week, American International Group, the world’s
largest insurance firm, announced a record $7.8 billion loss in the first
quarter of 2008. This brought the company’s loss to $13.1 billion over the past
two quarters. AIG has written down $20 billion in credit derivative contracts
since December.
The
deepening financial crisis of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the two major
mortgage companies that are sponsored by the US government, is indicative of
the way in which the crisis on Wall Street is being offloaded onto the
government. Freddie Mac on Wednesday reported a loss of $151 million in the
first quarter of 2008. The market responded to this lower-than-expected loss by
driving the company’s stock up by 9 percent.
However,
the reported figure was achieved by means of accounting gimmicks that concealed
an actual loss of $2 billion. The previous week, Fannie Mae reported a first
quarter loss of $2.2 billion. Its stock also shot up.
The two
companies suffered more than $9 billion in mortgage-related losses last year,
and are sitting on as much as $19 billion in additional losses that they have
not yet fully acknowledged, analysts say. Their combined cushion of $83 billion
underpins a colossal $5 trillion in debt and financial commitments—a level of
leverage that is unsustainable.
But in the
aftermath of the bursting of the housing bubble, the government has allowed
them to expand their loans while lowering their capital cushions. This is
because the two government-backed firms are essentially taking over the
mortgage financing business that has been dumped by the banks and investment
firms.
As the
New
York Time reported last week, “As Wall Street all but abandons the mortgage
business, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac now overwhelmingly dominate it, handling
more than 80 percent of all mortgages bought by investors in the first quarter
of this year. That is more than double their market share in 2006.”
In a
separate article on Thursday, the
Times explained the reason for the
stock market’s enthusiasm for the shares of the two companies. “‘Both these
companies are clearly going to be insolvent by the end of the year, but
everyone knows that Congress will do anything to keep them afloat, because if
Fannie and Freddie go under, the entire global financial system will melt
down,’ said Christopher Whalen, a founder of Institutional Risk Analytics, an
independent research firm. ‘These companies’ earnings don’t matter. Their
accounting hardly matters. People buy the stock because they believe the
federal government will bail them both out if things get really bad.’”
No such
bailout is in the works for the millions of families that are losing their
homes as a result of the mortgage crisis.
Foreclosure
filings surged 65 percent in April from April 2007, according to a report
issued Wednesday by RealtyTrac. One in every 519 households received a
foreclosure filing—the highest such figure since the real estate tracking
company began issuing foreclosure reports in January 2005. Nationally, 243,353
homes were facing foreclosure last month. That amounts to 2 percent of all
homes.
Foreclosure
filings rose in all but eight states. The hardest hit states included Arizona,
California, Florida and Nevada. Analysts expect the foreclosure rate to
continue to rise, spiking in the third and fourth quarters of this year.